Archive for July, 2010
July 31st, 2010 | 
Author: 
Here is a sample of a Spoof on the past and latest.
The *** or World Task Force has released a new comprehensive study into all possible solutions to areas stricken with Over crowed schools, huge economic downturns and the increase in School and Business closures across America and globally. After many years of tax dollars and revenues from various state lottery dollars and taxes on revenues from Casinos the *** published in the *** Journal on 7/09/2010 a comprehensive solution to the crisis.
According to the report from spokes person and client of *** Mr. Bullshivik the solution is for children to simply “Not Go.” According to the findings this will result in the overall reduction of students so teachers can focus on actually intelligent children who will benefit from a more direct eduction, and though as a by product this will mean more hooligans in the streets joining gangs and becoming likely to increase in involvement with illegal conduct such as drugs a d prostitution, the benefits will far outweigh the crisis as providing more intelligent specialized children, increase in robotic technologies to supplant a dwindling work force, a resulting drop in excessive population issues allowing gang violence to increase and life threatening diseases to take out the extra baggage and justify the discontinuation of public assistance networks and services that are bankrupting the economy. In addition there will be better jobs available for those who abandon these regions who have received the education and such as health-care and related public services can be geared more towards the better social stock of the civilization and in the resulting slums allow nature to take its course.
These regions can than be isolated and walled up and allowed to crumble and will be policed by armed soldiers and regional marshals to prevent the isolated regions that will be called WCS or World Controlled Sectors or CICs which are Civil Isolation Centers, to keep UIs or Undesirable Influences from Civil City Regions, or CCRs. Those that would otherwise continue to be a strain on the legal system including inmates from various prisons will also be reassigned to a CIC (pronounced Sick in English) which will further reduce the excessive expenses of having to build larger prison systems on valuable lands and potential centers of much needed resources and can be applied Internationally in order to preserve a Democratic Culture and Civil Society.
Political Adviser, Harry Dickers agreed and expect the predominant targeted UIs to be the largest resistance in the New World Restoration Effort of House Bill NWRE 187 which also gives clear and decisive power of private vote to the new and intended UPELG-GA or Unified Political, Executive and Legislative Governance of Global Allience once such a program is initiated and will after a swift Military effort be more than sufficient in initiating the round up program called Operation Ditch the Dirt or ODTD and those who have been causing a financial burden not just in the US but in the World economy. This will include the Homeless, and those who are considered terminally ill, disabled, Mentally deficient or challenged, or don’t speak the language, as well as addicts to illegal and prescription drugs, as anyone with any observable and irrevocable debts.
The *** and intended UPELG-GA plan on presenting this to countries with all the research and evidence under a secret UN meeting with nations most likely to support the efforts and the program models in exchange to private resources and shared economic benefits to the officials and their families as a UN bill called WDR or World Divine Retribution and believed it will pass with a 9 out of 10 percentile with the elimination of so called outmoded International laws.
In addition the policy will allow for the discontinuation of trades with all other countries whose conditions and technological underdevelopment have only further served to stress global economic infrastructures and will be effectively cut off and allowed to perish at their own hands, and any of those intending to try and invade or sneak into “restricted countries” will be executed as threats to the Global and International security of the intended UPELG-GA.
This report by the *** has been applauded as an intelligent and un-bias approach to solving the present over all crisis the World is enduring and a Tribunal of members of the UPELG-GA will be considered as privately elected International Presidential Members. In addition Science and Technology will be the only accepted social truth in the new GA for short of the UPELG-GA and any and all religions, religious institutions and so forth will be effectively banned as psychologically detrimental to the over all progress of the New World Agenda.
After the successful completion of the Agenda the Aliens will be more open to land and once more interact with the Superior global soc
Reggie Buontempo
Posted in Other - Social Science | 
Tags: Illegal Conduct, Possible Solutions, State Lottery | 
1 Comment »
Hello! I refinanced my mortgage to take advantage of a 5% reduction in principal, approx $20K. This in an investment property so I understand that this would be a taxable event. I am wondering if I sell the house (owned for 3 years) this year for a $20k loss, would the two cancel out? Many thanks in advance!
Coy Mo
The barking of the dog in the night Sdv
Not necessarily something
Know,
Many times
None of the bark,
Oisahm not know
In the silence? Each disease medicine Isttab only puzzling the folly of Ehadaha
Women need to be beautiful Thelatp one of the spouses to pay their debts and to one she loves him and one for a hit
Women did not end up something and did not
Maimut another man in the heart of women in the tongue
A man was shot and women is the wood and the air is the devil
Kzlk women, followed by escape and run them follow you
Sepp Habebi liked the … Maiji reduction and to stop Delh
If you want to know the true age of a woman to ask her sister
Women: a man is better than Dmim funds and a handsome man with Flosse
Known as the most studied, and known as the most forgotten more and more known as the Forgotten less – so why study?!
My empty heart and empty mind: What Osaadk.
The difference between man and dog … That dog do not bite the hand that feeds
I work in silence .. Valosd not roaring, a fish!
The pessimist: optimistic disappointed?!
Many of the artifacts of women to the extent that it is not the time to be polite
Men can not forget the first woman I love, and women do not forget the first man betrayed
The last man to die in Hmokh. The last thing to die in the women’s memory
Although we call it Alhmarp,
What Nadettha days of the name,
Known fact that the names,
I know her real name,
Silence,
Was created so that others Nbouh
Stephen Granillo
I purchased a condo in feb of 2007 and it has lost value (about 50K). I did a little research about the stimulus plan and I meet all of the criteria to get a loan modification (my debt to income ratio is 60% and the condo is occupied by me). There is one thing that I’m not sure about though, in order to qualify it says you have to prove a hardship (i.e a significant reduction in income, or significant increase in expenses). I still have my income but my work has reduced overtime hours, and this is something I counted on helping through the first few years of being a homeowner. Also, my employer has been talking about reducing staff 25% but this wont happen for a few months.
Does anyone know if they will qualify me based on my employer reducing overtime hours? This is significant to me because I live paycheck to paycheck.
Sherril Pellegren
I have a few questions concerning it.
1. I know you have to send in a written request, a copy of orders, and specify which statue you’re using. So, what would a copy of orders look like? For example, if someone has a reporting date for OCS or BMT, what would they use? An actual example of a form would be great! Also which statute is it that I should address in my letter to the creditor?
2. When using it on credit cards, do the lending companies actually close the credit card account or does it remain open after SCRA has been used?
3. If the credit card remains open, will using it again void the SCRA debt reduction to 6%? For instance, if I owe 3,000… I use SCRA, then I use the credit card again to purchase food… now, I owe 3,025… Does the rate go back to the original rate on the whole amount? Or is 3k under 6% and the rest under the normal percentage?
To clarify, the act is for anyone on ACTIVE duty. Anyone at OCS or BMT is on active duty if they are not part of the reserves.
I do not know what orders look like. So, it would be nice if someone were able to show a template of how orders are supposed to look, or inform if the sign up contracts for active duty will suffice, as well as list the statute to reference when sending a letter to the creditors.
Lacy Horwood
If you going to be mean and not answer and say do your homework than dont answer. I do my homework i just need help with these
16. A commodity futures market exists within the broader commodities market for which of the following reasons?
(Points: 2)
Contracts setting the price and date for a commodity purchase are transferable.
Commodities cannot be sold until they have been extracted from nature.
Forward contracts allow brokers to pay for commodities up front.
The exchange rate for commodities varies as time goes on.
17. Which of the following actions can the government take to raise money?
(Points: 2)
Sell stocks.
Issue bonds.
Lower interest rates.
Exchange currencies.
18. Which of the following is the act of buying and selling money using other types of money?
(Points: 2)
Issuing dividends
Decreasing utility
Maximizing profits
Exchanging currency
19. If the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar is 1:1.3, which of the following is true?
(Points: 2)
It costs less to buy a $5 item in Canada than it does in the United States.
It costs more to buy a $5 item in Canada than it does in the United States.
A $5 item costs three times as much in Canada as it does in the United States.
A $5 item costs three times as much in the United States as it does in Canada.
20. Which of the following best explains how buying on margin increases the leverage of currency traders?
(Points: 2)
Margin buying gives traders a profit rate that is one unit higher.
Buying on margin allows traders to sell shares in a company that they do not yet own.
Borrowing money allows traders to make large purchases without a large amount of money up front.
Currency purchases can only be made on the large scale, enabled by borrowing from currency brokers.
21. Because banks are often unwilling to loan money to a business in its early stages of development, startup business have a difficult time doing which of the following?
(Points: 2)
Getting debt financing
Securing venture capital
Finding an angel investor
Conducting an initial public offering
22. Businesses that wish to get loans from a private bank generally need to have which of the following?
(Points: 2)
An exit strategy
A wealthy startup investor
An online advertising budget
A history of profitable operation
23. Which of the following best describes the meaning of “going public”?
(Points: 2)
When a company starts offering its products for sale
When a company is bought out by a government agency
When a company begins selling shares of its stock to the public
When a company issues Treasury bonds that can be bought by anyone
24. Which of the following would be most likely to lead to a successful IPO?
(Points: 2)
An increase in the discount rate by the Fed
A company offering an IPO during a bull market
An Internet company offering a brand new service
A prospectus that is realistic about the company’s debts
25. A company can secure additional capital without going into debt by doing which of the following?
(Points: 2)
Going public
Taking a business loan
Buying out another company
Bargaining for wage reductions
Pauline Tuller
In the defensive-sounding statement released with his budget this morning, President Obama repeatedly blames the previous administration for leaving him in a position where he had “no choice” but to send the nation deeper into debt. He blames “irresponsible risk-taking and debt-fueled speculation—unchecked by sound oversight” for a deep recession that he speciously claims his administration’s massive spending prevented from becoming a depression.
Not once does the president acknowledge the role the government played in fomenting the recession. Instead, the president promises to move away from “business as usual” even though more spending, deficits, and debt are precisely that: business as usual. In this regard, the Obama administration’s first term is looking more like George W. Bush’s third term. Bush left the president with a $1.4 trillion deficit in FY2009; the deficit under Obama’s first year is set to rise to $1.6 trillion and would still be $1.3 trillion in FY2011.
Just like Bush, the president proposes minuscule savings through a small number of program terminations and reductions. But overall spending continues to rise, and in a $3.8 trillion budget the president’s disingenuous attempt to “cut” anything amounts to little more than a rounding error. The president also proposes to freeze non-security discretionary spending for three years, which he falsely claims will “help put our country on fiscally sustainable path.” In reality, last year’s stimulus and appropriations spending binge will mean actual outlays for this tiny portion of the overall budget will still be higher than what Obama inherited.
The president says that “rising to these challenges is the responsibility we bear for the future of our children, our grandchildren, and our nation.” The truth is our children and grandchildren are going to pay a painful price for the Bush/Obama profligacy. Present and future generations would be better served by Washington putting on the spending breaks and bringing to an end the economic distortions caused by government interventions.
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2010/02/01/obama-can-blame-bush-all-he-wants-but-his-budget-is-even-worse/
Juliana Gervasio
It’s interesting how Democrats know they’re going to need more money, yet they don’t have a budget………..WTF??
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_hoyer_taxes#mwpphu-container
A top House Democrat said Tuesday that tax increases will eventually be necessary to address the nation’s mounting debt, raising a difficult election-year issue as Democrats fight retain control of Congress……………….”As the House and Senate debate what to do with the expiring Bush tax cuts in the coming weeks, we need to have a serious discussion about their implications for our fiscal outlook, including whether we can afford to permanently extend them before we have a real plan for long-term deficit reduction,” Hoyer, a Maryland Democrat, told a forum on deficit reduction.
The tax cuts will be a big political issue in many congressional elections this fall, providing potential fodder for both political parties. Democratic leaders have yet to lay out a schedule for dealing with the tax cuts, but many rank-and-file Democrats want to extend them before the elections, so they can campaign on passing tax cuts for the middle class.
I’m talking about a CONGRESSIONAL budget, not WH projections.
Tiffany
The total debt has increased over $500 billion each year since FY 2003, considering both budgeted and non-budgeted spending.[12] The annual US budget deficit declined from $318 billion in 2005 to $162 billion in 2007, but is estimated to increase to $410 billion in 2008.[13] Annual deficits add to the debt. The Congressional Budget Office projects an annual budget surplus by 2012. However, this estimate is based on current law, which assumes sizable tax reductions will expire in 2010.[14] When the U.S. Government has a surplus, it may pay down its outstanding debt by paying back the principal of the outstanding bonds redeemed for payment while not issuing new bonds. The U.S. Government could also purchase its own outstanding securities on the open market if it was searching for a way to use a surplus to reduce outstanding debt that was not due for redemption in a given year.[15][16]
The Government Accountability Office (GAO), Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the U.S. Treasury Department have warned that debt levels will increase dramatically relative to historical levels, due primarily to mandatory expenditures for programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and interest. Mandatory expenditures are projected to exceed federal tax revenues sometime between 2030 and 2040 if reforms are not undertaken. Further, benefits under entitlement programs will exceed government income by over $40 trillion over the next 75 years.[17]The severity of the measures necessary to address this challenge increases the longer such changes are delayed. These organizations have stated that the government’s current fiscal path is “unsustainable.” Information was obtained from Internet.
Lien Marier
Since my son was born my husband and I have had difficulty keeping up with bills. I am currently unemployed due to personal health and I am going on 1 1/2 years of being able to work without finding a job even though I have been searching actively (I refuse to return to my previous employer because the environment contributed to my health issue, though it cannot be proven in a way that provides workman’s comp).
My husband has a solid job that earns just enough for us to pay our current bills. We do not have spare money for any extras (eating out, movies, etc.). There have been a few unexpected bills and have had to pull from his 401k to cover rent twice within the last 5 months in order to make ends meet.
One debt collection company has taken us to court knowing that we can barely make ends meet (I have been open and honest with them about everything). They took us to court, won the judgment, and have begun garnishing my husband’s wages at 25%. At this point, we will not be able to afford the next month’s rent, let alone groceries or even pay our electric bill (which is past due).
I do not have the ability to borrow money from anyone. The people I know who would be -willing- are incapable due to their own financial obligations.
I know that in some cases those below the poverty level can have wage garnishments adjusted to a lower amount, or removed altogether. My question is: how do I do this in the state of Montana? What forms will I need and which court will I need to go to in order to do so? At this point with the reduction I won’t be able to afford the next month’s rent without pulling from the 401k again and I don’t want to do that at all.
Tim Curtis